#Recruiters and Employers #Career Manhattan #Network Battleship Game.
#Recruiters, #Employers, we are the only players, #network battleship game. Who are winners or losers? Are they #creativethinkers, designers, #managers, #recruiters, or small businesses #owners?
Recently, we quite often come across a huge amount of glowing advertising. At every corner of the city are full of #creativedesign banners. Everywhere people are running around and bustling about and everyone is trying to find something, to buy or sell something. Among all this crowd we will meet these people: #owners of small and medium businesses, and #managers, and #creativedesigners, and #recruiters.
#Linkedin Battleship Game:
But with a huge number of talented people who could be useful in different areas of business, most of them have to earn in the image of #MickeyMouse, Spider-Man, or scamper around New York in the image of Batman or #SuperMan with their #superpower. But among them, maybe quite qualified #employees of the most popular professions. Why in the presence of a huge #choice, is it that people cannot find work in their specialties and talents? Site #Linkedin regularly updated vacancies, and the employer is constantly looking for employees. The question arises, “can talented people simply not notice?” Or we can ask another question: “What are the criteria for determining these talents?”Why in most cases many #resumes are ignored by recruiters? Why is every applicant not carefully processed, and what if you miss the person who suits you?
Social Media Batel :
For example, I also have a large number of talents: music and pedagogical education, as well as economic education, etc. I can list my talents for a long time. What are the criteria for determining the utility of the #jobseeker?
Many of the applicants have the necessary set of qualities, such as responsibility, efficiency, organization, communication, etc.
They also have professional quality depending on the scope of activities.Why are we still not working, and continuing to ride on the interview from which in the end there is no sense?